Prada’s SS26 Collection Refuses to Be Understood at First Glance

For Prada SS26, skirts crumpled, bras surfaced, and nothing begged to be understood.

Prada’s SS26 Collection Refuses to Be Understood at First Glance
Mai El Mokadem

In Prada’s Spring/Summer 2026 collection at Milan Fashion Week, there was no momentum, no arc, no need for escalation. What creative directors Miuccia Prada and Raf Simons presented instead was a dense field of visual cues: garments that concealed more than they revealed, proportions that felt deliberately thrown off balance, and silhouettes that resisted resolution.

prada

prada

From the first look, Prada SS26 made its stance clear. It isn’t here to seduce, rather, it’s here to interrupt. There were sheer bra tops layered under starched knits, ballooning nylon outerwear, and skirts that looked crushed by time, all styled with acid-bright gloves that clashed intentionally with the muted palette underneath. Uniforms bled into eveningwear, utility wear brushed up against lingerie, and nothing moved toward harmony.

prada

prada

In this collection, the skirts did all the talking, and none of it was small talk. Crushed, wrinkled, mixed-fabrics, and askew, they carried the creases of memory, not the polish of presentation. Some sat stiffly under crisp shirts, others peeked out beneath oversized utility pieces.

prada

prada

The silhouettes were a kind of language breakdown; skirts worn low and loose, bandeaus tied flat against the chest, structured coats hanging just off-balance. If fashion has a grammar, this collection scrambled it. You recognize the words, but not the sentence.

prada

The colours followed that same logic of contradiction. Dusty lilacs, lime greens, navy, beige, and cherry red all appeared in deliberately non-complementary pairings. The fabrics toggled between the rigid and the unstable: pressed poplin, crushed taffeta, sheer layers, poofy skirts, and purposeful wrinkling made each outfit feel like it had already been lived in (a feeling fashion is so clearly craving now).

There’s a kind of intellectual friction at play, one that rejects harmony in favour of deliberate dissonance. The looks didn’t evolve toward a finale; they existed in flat tension. No climax, no arc, no payoff. Beauty isn’t the priority here, disruption is. The collection resists admiration in favour of scrutiny. It’s not nostalgia. It’s not futurism either. It’s something eerily present.

 

For more stories of fashion, visit our dedicated archives and follow us on Instagram.